Mitigating flow to surface risk

Managing MOP by area

pressure gaugeSoon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.

The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.

Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.

  Get details of this cool tech   Subscribers get them for free

Tags: Thermal, Compliance

Granger Low  20 Apr 2016



Give us more flexibility in thermal schemes!

Reducing thermal heavy oil scheme red tape

ER schemes are hot right now. Here's the catch.

Cheap capital, fast reserves – but only if you get it right

Sequestering CO2 may disrupt nearby salt caverns?

Prompts conflict between operators

Breathing life into SAGD

Air injection as well as steam

Souring thermal schemes – the whole ball of string

AppIntel AI built to persuade. Loaded with evidence.

Flowback water has a second life

Frack water is too expensive to waste

9 potent ways to enhance steam injection: SAGD

Methane, propane, solvent or surfactant?

Let AppIntel AI watch this CO2 dispute for you

19 new developments today

Polymer floods fashionable again

Check out your competitor's polymer pad sizes and concentrations

This page last updated 31 July 2026.
Copyright 2011-2026 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting intelligence from industry submissions vetted by government. Nothing on this page may be construed as engineering or geoscience advice. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share