Life after polymer flood

But refused on a technicality

This applicant is giving up on a polymer flood returning it to water injection. Although their pilot technically worked it didn't meet their corporate hurdles. Unfortunately, due to a technicality, the AER refused to terminate their scheme requiring them to continue injecting polyacrylamide polymer.

Applications are closed for two reasons: technical and technicality. When the AER says, "Sorry, we don't believe you should inject here," they're closing your application on technical grounds. If you notified the wrong parties or don't have a pool designation correct, that's technicality.

Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help. You can get these applications in moments by clicking the button below.

Tags: Closure, Polymer

Granger Low  20 Oct 2015

Continuing Canadian thermal innovation doubled oil production

Experimental Propane Solvent co-injection in thermal

Shale in SAGD

How shale much is too much shale? Ask AppIntel AI.

Measuring the rate of oil and gas technology growth

Energy transition inside the oil industry

The rise of water recycle

Join or perish